Analysis · 2 min read

Messi effect: MLS subscriptions more than doubled

MLS Season Pass had under a million subscribers before Messi’s debut. It passed two million within the season. Demand was not created: it became visible.

BL
Brice Le Ficher
Fondateur de Noyzee
Vue large de tribunes pleines dans un stade de football en nocturne

When Lionel Messi joined Inter Miami, audiences soared and the market discovered North America’s appetite for football. The story that took hold was one of demand created by a signing. That story is wrong, and the error it induces is expensive.

×2
MLS Season Pass subscribers between Messi’s debut and the end of the season.

What the Messi effect produced was not new demand: it was the revelation of pre-existing demand. The service had under a million subscribers before his July debut; it passed two million by the end of the season. A population that size does not form in a few weeks: it was waiting for a reason to pay.

Why that demand was invisible

It was invisible because the measurement instruments in use could not see it. Television ratings measure those who watch an existing offer; ticketing measures those with access to a stadium; CRM databases measure those who have already bought. All three share the same blind spot: they only count audiences already served.

A community following a foreign league, in a language that is not the market’s, with no dedicated local broadcaster, appears in none of these indicators. It exists nonetheless, it searches, it comments, and it waits for an offer.

Search signals capture exactly that population: they record interest independently of whether an offer exists. This is what makes them useful where transactional data is silent: that is, precisely in developing markets.

The price of discovering late

Discovering a market after its revealing event carries a mechanical cost. Broadcast rights are renegotiated upward, partnerships are signed at peak price, sponsorship inventory becomes scarce. Whoever arrives afterwards pays for the information the market has since absorbed.

Holding the map beforehand allows three things: securing positions at pre-peak prices, calibrating an offer while demand is still unserved, and negotiating with knowledge of what is actually being sold.

What this means in practice

  • For a league. Identify unconverted audience pools before investing in international development, rather than following already-hot markets where competition is entrenched.
  • For a broadcaster. Assess a competition’s latent demand in your territory before the tender, not after observing a competitor’s ratings.
  • For a brand. Spot the communities already following a sport without being addressed: these are the activations with the best ratio of cost to useful reach.

The general rule

A spectacular event almost never creates demand from nothing. It makes visible and monetisable a demand that was already present. The strategic question is therefore not “how do we react to the Messi effect?” but “which latent demands, invisible in our dashboards today, are waiting for their own trigger?”.

That is the question Noyzee equips, by measuring interest where it is expressed before an offer exists to capture it.

Sources

  1. MLS Season Pass a dépassé 2 millions d’abonnés en 2023, contre moins d’un million avant les débuts de Messi en juillet, Sports Business Journal, 2024
See what your audiences search for.

A demo on your sport: 30 minutes.

Request a demo

Also worth reading